Connect with us

Daily News

Panel maker revenues hit all-time high record in Q1 2021

A Display Supply Chain study
The increase in demand for flat panels for both IT and TV, and the corresponding increase in panel prices, has lifted the fortunes of panel makers across the industry, but the companies which have benefitted most have concentrated on LCD panels for large-area applications. This includes the Taiwan panel makers and CHOT, BOE and CSOT in China. LG Display’s emphasis on OLED has hindered its results, and companies focused on smaller screens such as JDI, Tianma and Visionox have not seen improvement compared to pre-pandemic results. With LCD panel prices continuing to increase in Q2 2021, the strong results are expected to continue.

Flat panel display revenues increased 1 percent Q/Q and 52 percent Y/Y, to hit a record in Q1 2021 at USD 34.8 billion. With all panel makers reporting their Q1 2021 results, the full industry review for Q1, displayed a terrific quarter for panel makers, especially those oriented toward large-area LCD panels.

Quarterly revenues for the 13 publicly traded panel makers showed that BOE passed Samsung for the top position in revenue share with Q1 revenues of USD 7.7 billion  BOE rode robust demand for large-area LCD to a 50 percent increase Q/Q in revenues while Samsung revenues decreased 29 percent Q/Q to USD 6.2 billion on the seasonal slowdown in smartphone panel sales. LGD is the only other company with a double-digit share, and LGD fell just short of Samsung for second place with revenues that rounded up to USD 6.2 . Then there is a cluster of four companies between 5 percent and 10 percent share: AUO, Innolux, CSOT and Sharp, each with revenues in the range of USD 2.7 – USD 3.1 billion.

 The effect of the Crystal Cycle is seen in industry margins. The increase in LCD panel prices for TVs and IT products has increased gross margins and EBITDA margins for four straight quarters. EBITDA margins are approaching the highest point of the previous Crystal Cycle peak in 2017, and gross margins exceeded the prior cycle peak by a small amount. Operating and net margins saw a small decrease Q/Q, but net margins remain higher than the prior Crystal Cycle peak at 10 percent.

These margin figures exclude certain companies from certain metrics: for example, Samsung reports operating margin for its display business, but not pre-tax or net margin. Nevertheless, the series is consistent over time, clearly demonstrating the industry’s long descent from 2017-2019 and sharp recovery in 2020-2021.

Display industry operating margins in recent years have been dominated by Samsung Display, but that dominance ended in Q1 2021 and BOE has taken the top spot. In Q4 2020, SDC’s operating profit of USD 1537 million captured nearly 40 percent of the industry total, but in Q1 2021 SDC’s share of industry operating profits fell to less than 10 percent while BOE operating profits of USD 1.4 billion took 39 percent of industry profits. 10 of the 12 panel makers reported operating profits and eight companies reported operating profits greater than USD 100M for the quarter with only JDI and Visionox reporting losses. With SDC operating profits falling by USD 1.2 billion Q/Q, the total industry operating results decreased by 10 percent Q/Q but compared to a year ago when the industry in total recorded an operating loss of nearly USD 1 billion, operating profits improved by USD 4.5 billion Y/Y. Excluding SDC the industry operating profits increased 35 percent Q/Q.

Net profit figures exclude Samsung and Sharp, which do not report net profits of their display businesses, but the rest of the display industry posted a net profit of USD 2.5 billion in Q1 2021, the highest total since at least 2013. BOE led the industry with a net profit of USD 972 million.

EBITDA by company is shown in the next chart, and EBITDA for the industry increased by 21 percent Q/Q and 274 percent Y/Y to USD 4.7 billion, the highest level since at least 2013 and likely the highest ever. All panel makers except JDI and Visionox posted positive EBITDA in Q1 2021. LGD took the top spot in EBITDA with USD 1453M in the quarter, with BOE not far behind at USD 1284M. EBITDA totals exclude Samsung, Sharp and CSOT, which do not report depreciation/amortization for their display businesses separately.

Turning to company balance sheets, inventory increased in absolute value in Q1 but remained restrained or even tight in relation to the higher sales revenue. Inventory value increased by 7 percent Q/Q and 21 percent Y/Y, but with the increase in shipments inventory days decreased 32 at the end of Q4 2020 to 31 at the end of Q1.

Profits in the last several quarters have allowed several panel makers to reduce their debt burden, or at least to reduce debt/equity ratios by increasing equity. BOE’s debt/equity ratio was reduced from 110 percent at the end of Q3 2020 to 78 percent at the end of Q1 2021, and LGD trimmed their debt/equity from 118 percent to 108 percent and AUO improved debt/equity from 66 percent to 57 percent in the same time frame. With strong Q1 profits, most panel makers increased their cash positions, so net debt/equity ratios improved even further. LGD’s net debt/equity decreased from 90 percent at the end of Q3 2020 to 75 percent at the end of Q1 2020.

Historically, panel makers have been notorious for their miserable performance on free cash flow (FCF). In prior crystal cycles, periods of profit were typically accompanied by heavy capital investment, so FCF was minimal at the top of the crystal cycle and negative at the bottom. In 2018, industry FCF was a negative USD 7.2 billion, and the industry booked another USD 5.1 billion of negative FCF in 2019. Increasing profits in the second half of 2020 allowed the industry to reach positive FCF for the full year 2020 at +USD 1.0 billion. The industry reported its third consecutive quarter of positive free cash flow in Q1 2021 for the first time since at least 2015 with the Taiwan panel makers leading the way. AUO and Innolux each booked more than USD 500M in FCF in Q1, and even little HannStar booked more than USD 100 million of FCF.

Click to comment

Notice: Undefined variable: user_ID in /home/cloudpanel/htdocs/ on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2021 TV Veopar Journal

error: Content is protected !!